What’s the price to pay for integrity?
23
like it- 0 comment
- ‹ Back to all posts
The ostentatious boastfulness, the overconfident insolence, and the gleaming conceit
are in fashion to prove integrity. But, to become a person of integrity, is it enough to say it? Apparently, it is so. The creators of modern images, through the art of killer sentences and syntactic confusions, are capable of express it without proving it. It’s a subjective reality TV and the decisions are made live.
Integrity has a precise meaning. But, who cares? It would be a defamation to dare and ask questions in a rule of law society, where justice and redemption remain inaccessible for the most of us!
The definition given by Webster dictionary is totally vague: “Integrity n. The quality or state of being complete or undivided; an unimpaired condition.”
When used to make reference to an honest person, could integrity be interpreted as a catchall concept, or the simple object of a verbal sparring match?
Management and governance integrity
Managers and rulers don’t have the obligation to a Sound Management. Except for some valiant Adm. A, who are isolated in Quebec, in an ocean of indifference, the decision makers and servants of the Government have an obligation to complying with the law directives, which the swindle kings and the Maffioso cockroaches have learned to turn into Swiss cheese.
A manager’s integrity can’t be partial or complete. One can’t be a little bit or almost a person of integrity. It’s the price to pay! In this case, how could we prove our integrity when managers refuse to give up to their potential right to embezzlement by preaching about integrity? What a paradox!
There might be a solution, though: The Sound Management matrix approach. Regarding the managers of integrity, let’s not forget that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link.
